I Phone Review

Some of the things we define have positive definitions because of that unique aspect they portray to us. In this case, war command being a function that has to be exercised time to time more or less continuously is one of the things I can give this positive definition. This is because the few functions related to it can be carried out by the army are beneficial since they are related to respect, existence and also operations.

The need for arises from and varies with the size, complexity and differentiation of an army. A one-man army requires no delegation of instructions, at least not in the sense that a hundred- man army does. An army operating to a single, solid, homogenous block of men would be comparatively simple to authority. A force of any size can be subdivided into several subunits; however, the problem of assigning a mission to each and of ensuring proper coordination among all becomes difficult.

The role of authority should make work easier by making sure that all the things needed in an army are available. Some of these things can include food, sanitary services, and also system justice among others. This role increases only with the sophistication of forces, and these forces make it possible to account for the attention paid to the role. Once all these aspect can be determined, carrying out responsibilities becomes possible, and the army can relate to facts that are of importance to them. Some of these facts include the amount of death on the enemy and also damages caused and enabling them to be time cautious and ensure there is the minimum or no loss to itself.

Responsibilities are an ability to determine what is true from what is a false, relevant thing from irrelevant, material from immaterial. In this case, authoritative responsibilities can be subdivided into two sectors. They can be determined as functional related and output related responsibilities. There are qualities that make an ideal control system, and they include the ability to gather information accurately, fast, comprehensively, and selectively.

With it, there are some pros that include coordination, harmony and peace among the troops, management of given tasks among the force members, cooperation between the commander and the troop members and also between the troop's members among themselves. The outcomes enable determine the progress of the force.

Though it may be of benefit to the army and the society, there is the other side of the coin.Authority can be the source of enmity between several commanders even in the same force which can cause a lot of dispute and damage. It is to the best interest of every person to know that it is not always that a commander is right. Some do not know how to manage anger or be lenient to the troop members who sometimes defy what they wanted done. Even leaders can be the cause of conflicts.

Systems of command can be differentiated and determined into other ways, which enables the problems approachable. Tactics used to deal with qualities like complexity increase, attention given to the responsibilities, emphasis of the command process, and also the strength and weaknesses determine the nature of command.

War command in itself can be the source of an organized army, and it can also be the source of a disorganized army. It depends on the management and the way of taking responsibilities. Though every time the word war comes up there is fear, it sometimes brings out the best in some people especially the troops and can also be their ruin.